PNN PhD survey: asking the relevant questions

PNN needs your input to improve the situation of PhDs in the Netherlands! Let us know what is going well and what is not going well in the PNN PhD Survey! This survey also covers topics that are usually not addressed in PhD surveys, but are crucial to improve the situation of PhDs. PNN will handle the data confidentially, so you can feel free to share all concerns you might have.

The more PhDs fill in the survey, the better PNN will be able to address your problems and to convince policy makers to make changes! We therefore call on everyone who is currently working on their PhD project, regardless of contract type or institution, to fill in this survey!

On top of that, by participating in the survey, you can opt in for a lottery to win one of two Career Coaching Sessions with a professional career coach!

You can fill in the survey here!


Since 2014, PNN awarded a PhD supervisor with the supervisor of the year award during the national PhD day. This year we continue this tradition by handing out the national Supervisor of The Year award during a mini symposium, themed ‘Supervision, the right way’.

Can you always rely on your supervisor? Is he or she outstanding when it comes to communication? Gives great feedback and deserves to win this award? Enroll your supervisor via this link and fill in our short. Or take a look at this page for more information.


PNN launches Platform External PhDs

PNN has launched a digital platform for external PhD candidates, purposed to connect external PhDs with each other and with PNN. The goal is to break the isolation that external PhD candidates often experience. On the platform, external PhDs  can ask questions and share information with each other, whilst PNN will regularly posts information useful for external PhDs. Also, PNN will organize virtual (and when the corona crisis is over, also physical) meetings for external PhD candidates, which will be announced on the platform.

For an exchange of more personal experiences, we also started a private facebook group:

Are you an external PhD candidate, and do you think that a digital platform can be useful to you? Please register!

Are you an internal PhD candidate, and do you want to help external colleagues with information that you have easier access to they they have?   Please register!

Do you know other external PhD candidates, or people who want to apply for an external PhD position? Please forward this information.

The ideal university?

On Thursday February 20th, PNN president Lucille Mattijssen took part in the panel discussion at the presentation of Floris Cohen’s book “The Ideal University”. Prior to the discussion, she was given the opportunity to briefly discuss how Floris Cohen had revised the promotion system at the Ideal University. Her critical speech can be found  here.

Manifesto against experiment PhD Scholarships presented to Parliament

Today (4 February, 13:45), PhD scholarship students from the University of Groningen (RUG) will present their manifesto against the experiment with PhD Scholarship students to parliament. PhD scholarship students do exactly the same work as employee PhDs, but for less money and under poorer employment conditions. For example, the RUG promised PhD scholarship students more freedom in setting up their project, but in practice their freedom did not differ from that of employee PhDs. Also, PhD scholarship students are officially not allowed to teach, but were in some cases urged to do so by their supervisors.

In this manifesto, PhD scholarship students therefore demand the termination of the experiment with PhD Scholarship students, employee status and compensation for the time they have worked as PhD scholarship students. The manifesto is supported by 1075 individual supporters, including 239 PhD candidates from the University of Groningen, and national organizations such as the PhD Network Netherlands, (student) trade unions and WOinActie.

The experiment started in 2016 and has been controversial from the start. Although the (not undisputed) interim evaluation of the experiment indicates that there are no adverse effects of the experiment, the PhD scholarship students themselves send a much more negative signal. In addition to the 239 scholarship PhD scholarship students who have signed this critical manifesto, 58 medical PhD scholarship students have gone to court to demand employee status, and other PhD scholarship students are considering to take the same step.

For the second round of the experiment, the University of Groningen has applied for another 650 PhD scholarship students, in addition to the current 850, despite fierce criticism from the university council. However, two faculties have already indicated that they will no longer participate in the experiment: the Faculty of Law found that there was insufficient difference between PhD scholarship students and employee PhDs to justify a difference in employment conditions, and the Faculty of Philosophy considers having two types of PhD students to be undesirable. In the light of these developments, the presentation of the manifest is good occasion for the members of Parliament to thoroughly reconsider the experiment.