PhD trajectories in the Netherlands are internationally recognized as being of high quality. PhD publications are in both qualitative and quantitative terms highly ranked. Overall, PhD candidates play an important role in the academic output of Dutch universities. They make up almost thirty percent of the total number of scientific staff of universities. In general, PhDs in the Netherlands are regarded as employees rather than students.
However, this employee status has came under pressure. The association of universities in The Netherlands (VSNU) and the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science increasingly regard PhDs as students rather than as employees. Consequently, they wanted to employ PhDs on bursaries instead of on employment terms. This implies that PhDs will not receive a salary anymore, but a bursary instead. Furthermore, they are not eligible for, for instance, unemployment benefits once their contract ends and (paid) maternity leave. Besides that, a desk and office within the university is at stake. In short, treating PhDs as students instead of seeing them as employees, has severe consequences for PhDs and are likely to make doing a PhD less attractive to talented students.
As a result of the above mentioned reasons, PNN is against a student status for PhDs. This viewpoint has been expressed by PNN in national media (see the list of press releases below), to members of Parliament and to the Dutch Ministry of Education.
As a consequence of the controversy that the bursary experiment caused within higher education, the former Minister of Education (Jet Bussemaker, PvdA) decided to stop with the implementation of ‘bursary-student-legislation’. She decided to start with experimental leglisation to investigate the effect of so-called bursary PhDs on a small scale, before making her final decision. Despite the negative advice of the Council of State to continue with this. Given that a majority of the members of Parliament approved the experiment in 2015, a number of universities is currently joining this experiment and employ PhD students. A condition for the introduction of this experiment was, among other things, that an interim evaluation would take place to prevent thee PhD students from being disadvantaged if the experiment turned out to be less positive.
Right from the start, the experiment met with criticism, as described by Science Guide, the Young Academy, trade unions and student organizations such as ISO and LSVB. Quite soon after the experiment was introduced, also at PNN, objections from the PhD students arrived. They feel they are second-rate PhD students because they have to do the same work as “regular” PhD students but have poorer working conditions and believe that the promised benefits of the experiment, such as more academic freedom, are not being achieved.
In the spring of 2019, CHEPS research agency presented an interim evaluation. PNN believes that this interim evaluation does not provide the answers to the questions to be answered. See also our detailed response (in Dutch). Unfortunately, under pressure from the Parliament, the current Minister of Education has promised to continue the experiment. This means that universities can register again from 2020. Although, in the first instance the minister indicated that she had faith in the interim evaluation report, it was announced in October that an independent investigation would be conducted to examine this interim evaluation
With this page, we will try to keep you up-to-date on the experiment. You can also find links to publications, however most are in Dutch. Any questions on this topic may be adressed to PNN through email@example.com.
Overview of relevant PNN press releases:
11 September 2015: University council in Leiden disapproves of bursary experiment
17 January 2014: PNN expresses worries and recommendations regarding student PhD candidate experiment
15 May 2013: Eurodoc statement: Best practice of employee status for PhDs in the Netherlands
30 January 2020: Ook filosofie stopt met beurspromovendi
28 January 2020: Een promovendus is wat waard!
24 October 2019: Extra check op tussenevaluatie promotieonderwijs
15 July 2019: Minister twijfelt niet aan evaluatie promotieonderwijs
3 July 2019: Reactie PNN op tussenevaluatie experiment promotieonderwijs
2 July 2019: Minister wil experiment studentenpromovendi toch verlengen
5 June 2019: Open brief Tweede Kamer: stem tegen verdere afbraak Nederlands promotiestelsel!
18 October 2016: Promovendi Netwerk Nederland: RUG negeert regels
18 October 2016: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen springt te los om met promovendi
11 May 2016: Bezuinigingen over de RUG van universiteiten (opinieartikel op ScienceGuide)
11 May 2016: Promotiestudent toch niet zo populair bij universiteiten
26 February 2016: Alleen Groningen dol op Promotiestudenten
19 January 2016: Raad van State Kritisch over Promotiestudent
8 January 2016: Officiële bekendmaking experiment Promotiestudent
11 September 2015: Leidse medezeggenschap zet streep door experiment promotiestudent
3 July 2015: Promovendi betalen of beurs
2 June 2015: Duizenden handtekeningen tegen experimenteren met promotiestudenten
2 March 2015: Overzicht inbreng schriftelijk overleg experiment promotieonderwijs
12 February 2015: Ervaringen van een beurspromovendus
11 February 2015: On-wetenschappelijk experiment met promovendi
17 June 2014: Reconstructie ervaringen met experiment promotiestudent jaren 90
2 December 2013: PNN uit zorgen over en geeft aanbevelingen voor experiment promotiestudenten
13 July 2013: Promovendi kritisch over bursalensysteem
22 May 2013: Zaak promovendi kansrijk bij Hoge Raad
26 April 2013: Teleurstellende uitspraak in zaak bursaalpromovendi
22 January 2013: Promotiestudent geschrapt uit de wijziging op de Wet op het hoger onderwijs
4 October 2011: Artikel in Trouw
27 September 2011: Bursalenstelsel
11 April 2011: Kamervragen over invoering bursalenstel
2 March 2011: Campagne tegen het bursalenstelsel